So a couple people (drag, I think?) labeled XFS as particularly "robust" and fast and, presumably, awesome. OK. This is not an argument, this is a question: if it's more robust than ext4, why are we ...
Lifehacker has been a go-to source of tech help and life advice since 2005. Our mission is to offer reliable tech help and credible, practical, science-based life ...
It is a very useful free software that can operate on Windows 95/98 / Me / NT / 2000 / XP / 2003 Server / Vista and rescue files from partitions formatted with Ext2 / Ext3 which is commonly used on ...
If you've been running Linux for a while, you're probably using the now slightly-outdated EXT2 or EXT3 file system. Technology blog Ghacks has a guide to converting those formats to the newer, faster, ...
do you know of any ways where we can actually find out how many subfolders we currently have inside of 1 folder? eg, so that we can find out how close we are to the danger line? say on linux etx3 the ...
OS X cannot natively read the popular Ext2 and Ext3 filesystems, though support for these filesystems can be implemented if needed. Topher, an avid Mac user for the past 15 years, has been a ...
Hosted on MSN
Filesystems on Linux: When Should You Not Use Ext4?
Ext4 is essentially the default Linux filesystem, offering simplicity and compatibility, making it a solid choice for most users. Btrfs supports snapshots and is self-repairing, while XFS excels with ...
Linux provides quite a few commands to look into file system types. Here's a look at the various file system types used by Linux systems and the commands that will identify them. Linux systems use a ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results